|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson Farms LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notill Fertilizer Placement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investigator 1 |
|
|
|
Investigator 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson Farms LLC
934 S. 4th
Osage City, Ks. 66523
Keith & Ben Thompson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phone |
|
|
|
Phone |
|
|
|
|
|
(785)528-3696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Email |
|
|
|
Email |
|
|
|
|
|
tfarms@kanza.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will different fertilizer placements at seeding affect yield? With
this in mind we would like to combine 2*2 and in row fertilizer
placement. KSU has looked at both 2*2 and in row placement in separate
studies but we would like to combine both to see what effect this
would have on yield. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To determine if there is a cumulative yield and economic effect of
combining the two fertilizer placement strategy. KSU has done both 2*2
and in row studies but not both together in notill and we feel there
will be both a yield and a economic advantage to combining both
fertilizer placement strategies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will use site mate software with GPS to track where fertility changes
are made. Would plan to sample- fertilizer in row with no fertilizer
2*2, fertilizer in row with 2*2 fertilizer, fertilizer 2*2 and none in
row. . The check in each of these would be no fertilizer. Also we
would like to look at the fertilizer in row placement with seed and
also fertilizer dribbled on surface above the seed. We would like to
also look at different three different fertilizer rates in the 2*2 and
in row study. They would be no fertilizer, rate that soil test
determined and 2 times the 2nd rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected outcome / Benefit to KARA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect to see a yield and economic advantage to 2*2 and in row
fertility placement over doing only a 2*2 or in row placement. This
advantage would offset the extra time and equipment needed at
planting. Also show that the GPS tracking maps of planting and harvest
can be used in place of weigh wagons to ground truth these variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|